Diamond loses more teams, what’s next

Three more teams leave Diamond for a MLB-controlled game broadcasts.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

On Tuesday morning, Baseball Prospectus published a feature of mine on the Diamond bankruptcy proceedings, and what they meant for the coming MLB offseason. As discussed last month, MLB already pointed out that the trajectory of the bankruptcy saga means impacted teams won’t be able to plan their budgets for the 2025 season, and the addition of another couple of teams — and the threat of more joining them — meant that we were going to be in for another quiet offseason.

On Tuesday afternoon, it was announced that three more teams whose deals with Diamond had been dropped would not seek to renegotiate with the regional sports network… network… and would instead work through MLB to broadcast its games. The league already did this in 2024 with the Diamondbacks, Rockies, and Padres, and they’ll now be joined by the Guardians, Brewers, and Twins. (The Rangers have also separated from Diamond, but they’re going to peddle their wares on their own, without MLB handling things, so they aren’t part of this conversation.)

Continue reading “Diamond loses more teams, what’s next”

Notes: MLB’s latest threat to Bally Sports, NCAA unfair labor charge

MLB and Bally continue to go at it, while Dartmouth College’s men’s basketball team ups the ante.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

There’s been some progress in the Bally/Diamond broadcasting rights bankruptcy debacle of late, but only for the National Hockey League and National Basketball Association. MLB is continuing to have issues with the regional broadcasting giant, and the latest stems from the agreement Bally made with the NHL and NBA. Evan Drellich has the full story at The Athletic, but there’s one specific thing I want to focus on here:

“Major League Baseball and those clubs are unable to plan to obtain revenue and to have certainty with respect to the 2025 season,” James Bromley, a lawyer for MLB, said in court Tuesday.

Judge Chris Lopez on Tuesday approved deals Diamond recently reached with both the NBA and NHL, calling them “a step in the right direction.” But contained in those agreements is a key date that has put MLB on the offensive: both require Diamond to come out of bankruptcy by April 1, shortly after baseball’s season begins.

Speaking for nearly 14 minutes straight, Bromley warned Diamond that it cannot wait that long to figure out its plans in a bankruptcy process that’s already taken nearly 18 months, and called the status quo a “Band-Aid.”

Nine teams are under contract with a Diamond-operated RSN for 2025, with another three facing expiring contracts after this season. So we’re talking about over one-third of the league not knowing just how much money they’ll be getting in 2025 for their television rights, and from where. Diamond, per Drellich, seems unfazed by the threats from MLB to escalate their legal action if this isn’t figured out sooner than later.

Here’s what matters about this from this newsletter’s perspective: whether 9-12 MLB teams actually will have a problem with revenue and cash flow in 2025 isn’t what we should be concerned about, but that their public position is that the lack of resolution from Bally will keep them from being able to plan out rosters for 2025 is an issue. Now, I’m not saying these clubs are absolutely all fine, that there won’t be issues with their numbers or what have you; it’s more that, by saying this, you know that they’re going to act as if there definitely are. As if 2025 is something of a lost year, before it even begins, one in which general managers of these clubs are probably going to have to work overtime to make creative upgrades to the roster that won’t increase payroll.

The 2023-2024 offseason was already a slow one. Yes, massive contracts were handed out to the very best talent out there, but the winter, for most, was a slow-going affair, one that resulted in a number of players signing very late, even during spring training, which in turn impacted the year they had. It took Blake Snell months to finally be the guy he’s supposed to be, to make it deeper into games (well, deep for Snell) and look dominant and healthy. Jordan Montgomery still hasn’t recovered from his late start and lack of prep. We’re probably just going to do that again, which shouldn’t be a surprise, really. Even without the broadcasting issue, the current CBA has just two more seasons on it before it expires. The league’s owners want to tighten their grip a bit before then, to help create problems that need to be solved in bargaining, in order to try to extract more from the players once more.

It’s not a new tactic, but the Bally issue helps give them an excuse for the kinds of behavior they’d be displaying, anyway. This is an ongoing story to watch, basically, that is about more than it’s about on the surface.


Late last month, Dartmouth College’s men’s basketball team union filed an unfair labor practice charge against the school with the National Labor Relations Board. The charge? A refusal to bargain with players. The union, formed in March, has certainly been patient with Dartmouth College, which has refused to enter collective bargaining with the players despite the NLRB’s regional director already declaring them to be employees.

In a way, this is all a positive, though. Dartmouth’s refusal to bargain, with the defense being that the NLRB has made a mistake, means that this is a case that’s probably going to end up in court, with decisions that reverberate throughout college athletics. The school wants a federal court to review it, even! Now, federal court could certainly be a blow to the idea of unionized college athletes, especially with how much more conservative they’ve become in recent years, but look at the current situation, where the NLRB has declared that these athletes are employees and should be treated as such. Dartmouth refuses to acknowledge this to be the case, so nothing has changed. The courts could force a change, and the results would then be NCAA-wide, because what separates Dartmouth College from every other institution with college sports on campus? Not a thing, other than that their students struck first.


No need for a full monthly check-in on the White Sox since I already did that on Friday, pre-Labor Day holiday, but just for the sake of having something here in early September all the same: the White Sox lost every game since that piece was published. They finished August 4-22, just one win better than July with the same number of losses, despite losing 16 in a row that month. They’re 0-3 to begin September, already set a new franchise record for losses in a season with weeks left to go, and are 14 losses away from setting the modern-day league record with 22 games to go.

Visit my Patreon to become a supporter and help me continue to write articles like this one.

Notes: White Sox stadium rumors, changing free agency, Diamond

Jerry Reinsdorf is doing it doing, changes are needed to get players to free agency sooner, and Diamond has a deal, maybe.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

Remember back during the winter meetings, when Jerry Reinsdorf went and had lunch with the mayor of Nashville? With the idea being that it was solely to help build up some leverage for some stadium demands in Chicago? Last week, the Chicago Sun-Times reported that the White Sox were in “serious talks” to build a stadium, following a meeting between Reinsdorf and Chicago’s mayor, Brandon Johnson.

Continue reading “Notes: White Sox stadium rumors, changing free agency, Diamond”

On MLB’s rejection of the Amazon/Diamond streaming proposal

MLB’s rejection is also them showing their hand on their preference for the future of broadcasting.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

You saw the headline, now let’s get to some background. From me on December 22, at Baseball Prospectus:

Continue reading “On MLB’s rejection of the Amazon/Diamond streaming proposal”

Notes: MLB broadcasting and Amazon, Tinyletter

The latest on the Diamond broadcasting issue, as well as some newsletter housekeeping notes.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

Here we go, the final newsletter for 2023. Thanks for reading through what has been a year that involved a lot more stadiums and a lot less labor-specific news than expected. But don’t worry, MLB deciding to mess with workers of one kind or another is a tradition they don’t plan on leaving behind forever.

***

Earlier this week, it was reported that Diamond Sports Group, which runs the Bally regional sports networks, was seeking a way back to the kind of profit they were hoping for by negotiating a partnership with Amazon. This would allow them to rely less on the shrinking cable market, and by moving onto one of the streaming video platforms with the most subscribers. Amazon Prime Video has 200 million subscribers, with Netflix (247 million) having more, Disney+ behind at 150 million, Paramount Plus at 63 million, Hulu at 48 million, Peacock 28 million, ESPN+ 26 million, Apple TV 25 million. Amazon Prime Video is massive, is the point, with only the original streamer ahead (and also the only one not tied mostly to their own original content). If Diamond is going to partner with anyone in the space, Amazon makes the most sense, especially since they’ve already successfully partnered with the NFL for Thursday Night Football.

Continue reading “Notes: MLB broadcasting and Amazon, Tinyletter”

Notes: MLB airing D-Backs’ games, more bad Las Vegas journalism

Another team dropped by Bally, and another piece of “journalism” on the Las Vegas A’s ballpark.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

MLB announced on Tuesday that they are taking over the production and distribution of Diamondbacks’ games. A bankruptcy judge approved Diamond Sports Group’s request to “shed” their contract, as ESPN’s Alden Gonzalez put it, making Arizona the second club to have their broadcasts become MLB’s responsibility: less than two months ago, the Padres became the first.

Blackouts for fans in the “home television territory” have been eliminated for Diamondbacks’ games in the process, by way of a few different options. A “direct-to-consumer” streaming plan through MLB.tv is available, for either $19.99 per month or $54.99 for the rest of the 2023 season: it should be pointed out that this is a separate charge from the usual MLB.tv subscription, so if you’re in Arizona, for instance, and wanted to watch Diamondbacks’ games on the service you previously could not since they were blacked out, that’s still designed solely for out-of-market games.

Continue reading “Notes: MLB airing D-Backs’ games, more bad Las Vegas journalism”

Diamond is probably going away, but broadcasting should remain

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

There sure seems to be trouble in regional sports network land, and the question of the day is how it will end up impacting Major League Baseball and the payments owed to them by various RSNs. There’s the well-publicized issue of what’s going on with Diamond Sports Group, which runs Bally Sports, as they announced they’re skipping a $140 million interest payment, which now gives them a 30-day grace period to figure out if they’re going to make said payment or file for bankruptcy instead. Alongside that, though, is AT&T Sports, which is run by Warner Media, and has possibly already missed out on its first slate of payments for broadcasting games. Possibly, because there have already been denials from AT&T Sports, on the matter, but we can at least treat that as a potential where there’s smoke there’s fire situation until things are known for sure one way or the other. [2/20/2023 note: This article originally linked to a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story here, but the Post-Gazette staff is on strike. Apologies for the oversight; the link has been removed.]

Continue reading “Diamond is probably going away, but broadcasting should remain”