Notes: Manfred speaks, the disposable pitcher, Diamond Holdings

Looks at the week that was.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

Forgive me for being a little behind here on the coverage dates, but my phone was undergoing a slow and then rapid death, which cuts into the whole keeping up with the news thing. So now, new and working phone in hand, we can hit some notes from around MLB, starting with the thing Rob Manfred recently opened his mouth about.

On May 6, Manfred spoke to (or spoke “at,” as Neil deMause put it) a gathering of editors at an Associated Press conference, with an emphasis on extolling the virtues of publicly financed stadium projects. It is incredibly Manfred for its… style. You know the one. That thing where he exaggerates and makes wild, indefensible claims without any proof to back them up, and would definitely get angry at a reporter or fans or sitting Congressperson for calling him out on it and asking for more details.

Continue reading “Notes: Manfred speaks, the disposable pitcher, Diamond Holdings”

Tax loopholes beloved by sports teams under IRS ‘scrutiny’

Maybe the first step toward closing a tax loophole that sports owners abuse every year.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

Let’s rewind to the summer of 2021 for a moment. A trio of ProPublica reporters published an extensive look at the legal tax loopholes that sports team owners used to, essentially, lie about their finances. The idea being that they could make a profit, but, by utilizing some tax loopholes, report the opposite, allowing them to not have to pay their share of taxes. And that kind of money adds up, whether you’re talking about what owners are allowed to pocket, or the money that should have gone into the federal government’s coffers. Maybe there would be more money around for repairing the country’s failing infrastructure if the wealthiest actually paid their portion each year!

Continue reading “Tax loopholes beloved by sports teams under IRS ‘scrutiny’”

Notes: MLB/Roku streaming deal, White Sox still bad

MLB might have a new streaming partner soon, and Jerry Reinsdorf’s White Sox are certainly made in his image

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

According to The Athletic, Major League Baseball might be leaving Peacock behind when that deal is up, and moving over to Roku for streaming Sunday morning baseball games. It’s not that Peacock is uninterested in maintaining their relationship with MLB, so much as, per Andrew Marchand, they were willing to do so for one-third the value of the current deal, which pays $30 million annually.

Now, exactly which service MLB ends up with isn’t of much concern, but the thing to wonder about here is what Roku will be willing to pay to pry the league’s Sunday morning games away from Peacock. If there is no other competitor for the services, then sure, maybe Peacock gets away with offering less than last time, because MLB’s choice is then $10 million per year or nothing. With Roku involved, though, maybe Peacock bumps their offer up, or, in order to get their foot in the door in this realm, Roku is happy to surpass any offer coming from Peacock in order to be the most attractive option. Which could in turn mean MLB is (1) finding new partners to increase their revenue or (2) finding new partners in order to maintain their current level of revenue. Whether it’s the first or second thing depends a lot on how everything shakes down with Diamond and MLB’s eventual streaming-heavy future.

As Marchand notes, there’s a lot going on there at the moment:

MLB has been facing major television headwinds; especially recently with Diamond Sports failing to come to a carriage agreement with Comcast that has left 12 teams’ games unavailable to those franchises’ viewers that have that service.

The league is also staring at the possibility of ESPN opting out or threatening to opt-out to reduce the $550 million yearly deal it has for Sunday Night Baseball, the Home Run Derby and first round playoff games. The Disney-owned network has the option in its current deal to exercise the opt-out after next season.

ESPN, like Amazon and potentially Apple, would like to be part of the solution for the failing regional sports model as MLB evolves its plans.

It’s not that ESPN doesn’t want to be partnered with MLB any longer, but that the shape of their partnership could be changing, so maybe they don’t want to be committed in the same way they were previously, in order to be part of a larger “solution” for the league, with funds rearranged to go to that. It’s all something to watch out for, with a lot of moving pieces that might now include Roku, especially coming off of an offseason in which the league threw their hands up to go, “whoops can’t spend don’t know where our money is or where it’ll come from.”


My latest for Baseball Prospectus ran on Tueday, and it’s titled “The White Sox are Playing the Same Old Game.” In late-April I covered the White Sox horrific start in this space, noting that a deeper look at things would be coming, and that’s what that feature ended up being.

The gist of things is that the White Sox are bad because they’re Jerry Reinsdorf’s White Sox. They don’t spend like they should or could, the front office is based on the same pipeline from decades ago that has produced far less success than you’d think it would have considering the continuity involved, and the goal, no matter what Reinsdorf says, is to make money, not to win:

It’s 2024, and the White Sox are still without a single $100 million free agent in their history. Their most significant free agent contracts have gone to Benintendi ($75 million over five years) and Yasmani Grandal ($73 million over four). The extra $500,000 that Dallas Keuchel received is the only reason Albert Belle’s $55 million free agent deal from 1997 is no longer in the top five in franchise history. They simply do not spend like a team from Chicago could or should: by Cot’s Contracts’ count, the White Sox rank 17th in the majors since 1991 in total free agent spending. They don’t ignore free agency completely, but they completely avoid the top end. Which is why, despite a whole bunch of top-end talent on free agency this offseason, they ended up with the likes of DeJong and Maldonado, which helped them cut their payroll by around $58 million, down to $121 million for Opening Day. It’s not like they had a bunch of prospects to plug in, and the farm system doesn’t have much in the way of future help, either, which is why Baseball Prospectus ranked it 25th in the league this winter. This is a team that needs to spend to have any chance right now—in a weak division, in a league that now has six Wild Card clubs—and that’s just not happening.

It’s dire! Maybe the White Sox can improve enough to avoid being in Cleveland Spider-level discussions throughout the summer, like the A’s managed to rebound enough to avoid a year ago, but what does that mean, exactly? They’d still be a team coming off of a 100-loss season that managed to be even worse in the following campaign. One with a farm system dealing with a famine, that won’t spend on the top end of free agency, and that regularly makes terrible decisions on the free agents they do acquire. With a general manager who was part of the building of the current mess they’re in, as both a farm director and then assistant GM. With Reinsdorf still in control of it all!

Oh, and of course this is all happening while they have an absurd public subsidies ask out, all because Reinsdorf wants to build his own Braves-style Battery Park around a new stadium so he can rake in even more cash for doing nothing. John Fisher might be the most brazen owner in part due to how he’s an adult-sized baby with his parents’ money who throws temper tantrums when he doesn’t get his way, but Reinsdorf might be the actual worst. Fisher strikes me as not evil so much as kind of just a huge self-centered dummy, which is awful in its own way, sure, but different. Reinsdorf, though… this guy has been at the center of plenty of what’s been terrible about the game for decades, from collusion to depriving amateurs of negotiating power and bonuses, avoiding giving free agents money, prying enormous subsidies out of the hands of the public, while lying about relocating to do it. He is the literal worst.

Visit my Patreon to become a supporter and help me continue to write articles like this one.

MLBPA picks up a win, awful uniforms will see changes

And the Players Association would like everyone to know Fanatics wasn’t the issue here.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

Not every labor win has to wait for bargaining. Take the recent issue with MLB’s uniforms, for instance: in short, they’re terrible, and now they’ll be fixed. The when of that is a bit more up in the air — according to ESPN’s Jeff Passan, it’ll be early 2025 at the latest — but hey. The players won, despite the defense of MLB this spring basically being a gaslighting, “no, we’ve always been able to see your balls.”

It’s not just that the fabric was see through, either. Pants and tops didn’t match. The lettering on the jerseys was small, and looked like it belonged on children’s replica jerseys. The pants would rip at seemingly the drop of a hat. The supposedly breathable fabric of the new-style jerseys resulted in a lot of pictures of players absolutely dripping with sweat from games played during the coldest part of the season. It was all a terrible experiment in… well, in who knows what, really. The kind of innovation companies always looking to make more money or cut costs play around with, that results in messing with what already works in a way that makes it worse? The Google, if you would. Nike didn’t need to do any of what they did here, with the players even warning them they didn’t like the directions they were taking, and yet, here we are.

Continue reading “MLBPA picks up a win, awful uniforms will see changes”

The Rockies and Marlins are bad, too

Woof, again.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

The White Sox got my full attention on Wednesday because they are simply that bad — like, angling for historically awful if they keep it up for too long, they’re one of four teams ever to lose 22 of their first 25 contests and help does not appear to be in sight for a team we already knew would be terrible — but they’re not the only horrid team in the league this year.

Continue reading “The Rockies and Marlins are bad, too”

The White Sox might be terrible

Woof.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

In all honesty, I had planned to write about the teams that were looking horrific due to their roster mismanagement and lack of spending and effort besides the A’s, just to change things up a bit, you know? I keep staring at the White Sox’ 2024, though, and forgetting why I ever needed to check in on what’s happening with the Marlins and the Rockies, too, because it seems like it barely compares.

Continue reading “The White Sox might be terrible”

Notes: The A’s can get worse, Diamond Baseball Holdings

Why the A’s can get worse, and what is Diamond Baseball Holdings up to?

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

My latest at Baseball Prospectus published on Tuesday, and it’s on how the A’s can get worse. You would think they’re already as bad as they can be, but no. Right now, at least, there’s some hope that maybe things could get better, because the move to Las Vegas could get John Fisher to become a completely different person who spends money like he’s said will happen. But that’s very unlikely. Unlikely enough that I went on the record to say that it’s not happening, while feeling pretty good about my chances of not having to eat crow about it later.

Continue reading “Notes: The A’s can get worse, Diamond Baseball Holdings”

Notes: Other teams unhappy with A’s, gambling, Scott Boras axed

Catching up on a week of news that wouldn’t stop.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

Last week, Buster Olney tweeted out something that made the whole internet groan. Not at Olney — not this time — but at pretty much all of MLB. You can probably figure out why just from reading what was said:

Within other organizations, there is a lot of disgust with how the A’s have handled the ballpark situation — especially when there’s no actual ballpark plan settled in Las Vegas. And there is an assumption the A’s will tank in the next few years, because their revenue stream will be down to a trickle. “This makes us all look bad,” said one person.

This was met with a chorus of “why did they approve the A’s move, then?!” which, understandable. A few things I’ve been thinking about, though, that should get a mention. For one, Olney doesn’t clarify whether this is from an owner, or an executive who happens to work for one, who had nothing to do with the move being allowed. It would be helpful if we knew: my guess is that it’s an executive who knows how bad of a look this is, and not one of the owners, who by and large are too removed from humanity to ever consider how something will make them “look” to people at large.

Continue reading “Notes: Other teams unhappy with A’s, gambling, Scott Boras axed”

Maybe the new Orioles’ owner will extend their exciting young players

The Orioles promoted another top prospect, which is as good a time as any to wonder if things will be different now.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

Happy Jackson Holliday… day. The son of Matt Holliday is also the top prospect in the Orioles system, and, an even bigger deal, also the minors just in general. The when of the call-up is a bit weird, since the O’s didn’t let him start the season in the majors but he’s still been promoted early enough that he’s eligible for the “don’t manipulate service time” prize at the end of the season, but hey. He’s here now. Neat.

So, it’s a good time to remind everyone of what John Angelos, the previous principal owner of the Orioles, thought about extending their young players so that their competitive window could stay open for longer, even if it cost more than when these guys are all league-minimum or close to it players:

Continue reading “Maybe the new Orioles’ owner will extend their exciting young players”

Why are the A’s allowed to be this way?

The A’s are moving to Sacramento temporarily, so let’s remind ourselves of why this is happening at all.

This article is free for anyone to read, but please consider becoming a Patreon subscriber to allow me to keep writing posts like this one. Sign up to receive articles like this one in your inbox here.

On Thursday, it was announced by the A’s that they would be spending the 2025-2027 seasons (and possibly 2028’s) playing their home games in Sacramento, at a Triple-A stadium. Not just in terms of what team already plays there, but also in terms of its facilities, per former player Trevor Hildenberger.

The move isn’t fully official, since the Players Association still has a say in whether those facilities are going to be on par with what’s required (which might require forcing them to be improved somehow, perhaps), but that’s not the focus of today’s wonderings. Let’s unpack some social media posts from yesterday. Nothing dramatic happened, it’s just to set the scene of the question being answered.

Continue reading “Why are the A’s allowed to be this way?”